Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible

Manuscrito 39 (2):5-58 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Resumen DeLP is a defeasible argumentation system that captures common sense reasoning features. Examples proposed in the literature show that DeLP gets counterintuitive results. We suggest a possible cause of this problem and we propose an approach to neutralize it. The approach is based on the pre-selection criterion of arguments, called maximal specificity. The criterion establishes that an argument will be considered like maximally specific only if, for every argument based on more specific evidence which does not explain the same conclusion, it explains neither the contrary nor something more general.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rebatible, argumento.Gustavo Adrián Bodanza - 2011 - In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta.
La argumentación abstracta en Inteligencia Artificial.Gustavo Adrián Bodanza - 2015 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 30 (3):395-414.
Ad ( ), argumentos, falacias.Jesús Alcolea - 2011 - In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta. pp. 35--37.
Estructuras de argumentos.Gabriela Guevara - 2011 - In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta. pp. 239--242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
6 (#1,269,502)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations