Expectations and Choiceworthiness

Mind 120 (479):803-817 (2011)
Abstract
The Pasadena game is an example of a decision problem which lacks an expected value, as traditionally conceived. Easwaran (2008) has shown that, if we distinguish between two different kinds of expectations, which he calls ‘strong’ and ‘weak’, the Pasadena game lacks a strong expectation but has a weak expectation. Furthermore, he argues that we should use the weak expectation as providing a measure of the value of an individual play of the Pasadena game. By considering a modified version of the Pasadena game, I argue that weak expectations may provide a very poor measure of the value of an individual play of the game, and hence should not be used to value individual plays unless further information is taken into consideration
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzr049
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,165
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Strong and Weak Expectations.Kenny Easwaran - 2008 - Mind 117 (467):633-641.
Vexing Expectations.Harris Nover & Alan Hájek - 2004 - Mind 113 (450):237-249.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-02

Total downloads

189 ( #23,494 of 2,171,974 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #117,902 of 2,171,974 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums