Skolem and the löwenheim-skolem theorem: a case study of the philosophical significance of mathematical results

History and Philosophy of Logic 6 (1):75-89 (1985)
Abstract
The dream of a community of philosophers engaged in inquiry with shared standards of evidence and justification has long been with us. It has led some thinkers puzzled by our mathematical experience to look to mathematics for adjudication between competing views. I am skeptical of this approach and consider Skolem's philosophical uses of the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem to exemplify it. I argue that these uses invariably beg the questions at issue. I say ?uses?, because I claim further that Skolem shifted his position on the philosophical significance of the theorem as a result of a shift in his background beliefs. The nature of this shift and possible explanations for it are investigated. Ironically, Skolem's own case provides a historical example of the philosophical flexibility of his theorem. Our suspicion ought always to be aroused when a proof proves more than its means allow it. Something of this sort might be called ?a puffed-up proof?. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Remarks on the foundations of mathematics (revised edition), vol. 2, 21
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/01445348508837077
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,662
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
From Frege to Gödel.Jean Van Heijenoort (ed.) - 1967 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Models and Reality.Hilary Putnam - 1980 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (3):464-482.
Mysticism and Logic.Bertrand Russell - 1918 - Dover Publications.
Logic in the Twenties: The Nature of the Quantifier.Warren D. Goldfarb - 1979 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (3):351-368.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reflections on Skolem's Paradox.Timothy Bays - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
The Skolem-Löwenheim Theorem in Toposes.Marek Zawadowski - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (4):461 - 475.
The Mathematics of Skolem's Paradox.Timothy Bays - 2006 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic. North Holland. pp. 615--648.
A Proof of the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem.George S. Boolos - 1970 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 11 (1):76-78.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-10

Total downloads

46 ( #108,112 of 2,143,796 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #227,273 of 2,143,796 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums