This sentence does not contain the symbol X

The Reasoner 7 (9):108 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A suprise may occur if we use a similar strategy to the Liar's paradox to mathematically formalize "This sentence does not contain the symbol X".

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Formalizing Self-Reference Paradox using Predicate Logic.P. Olcott - manuscript
Literary Self-Reference: Five Types of Liar's Paradox.David Lehner - 2020 - Philosophy and Literature 44 (2):476-485.
Парадокс лжеца и первая теорема геделя о неполноте.Vitaly Tselishchev - 2017 - Schole 11 (2):415-427.
The paradox of the non-communicator.Theodore Drange - 1964 - Philosophical Studies 15 (6):92 - 96.
The truth-functional hypothesis does not imply the liar’s paradox.Matheus Martins Silva - 2016 - Filosofia Unisinos 17 (3).
Liar paradox mirroring our reasoning as Hegel's quasi-speculative sentence.Jae Jeong Lee - manuscript
Why the liar does not matter.Lon Berk - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):323-341.
The truth functional hypothesis does not imply the liars paradox.M. Martins Silva - 2017 - Unisinos Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):1-2.
Relatives of the Russell Paradox.Kees Doets - 1999 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (1):73-83.
透視悖論--說謊者的幽默指南.Stephen R. Palmquist - 2013 - In 拒絕再 Hea ── 真理與意義的追尋. Hong Kong: 次文化 [Subculture Limited]. pp. 37-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
n/a

Downloads
520 (#47,294)

6 months
97 (#60,071)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel Allen Alexander
Ohio State University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references