The Significance Of The Erosion Of The Prohibition Against Metabasis To The Success And Legacy Of The Copernican Revolution

Annales Philosophici 3:9-21 (2011)

Abstract

Although one would not wish to classify Copernicus’ own intentions as belonging to the late-medieval and Renaissance tradition of nominalist philosophy, if we are to turn our consideration to what was responsible for the eventual success of the Copernican Revolution, we must also attend to other features of the dialectical context in relation to which the views of Copernicus and his followers were articulated, interpreted, and evaluated. Accordingly, this paper discusses the significance of the erosion of the Aristotelian prohibition against metabasis to the eventual success of the Copernican Revolution

Download options

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
100 (#119,977)

6 months
12 (#64,239)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Aleksander
San Jose State University

References found in this work

Epistemology of the Sciences.Nicholas Jardine - 1988 - In Charles B. Schmitt, Quentin Skinner & Eckhard Kessler (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 685--711.
The Copernican Disturbance and the Keplerian Revolution.Norwood Russell Hanson - 1961 - Journal of the History of Ideas 22 (2):169.
Late Medieval Thought, Copernicus, and the Scientific Revolution.Edward Grant - 1962 - Journal of the History of Ideas 23 (2):197.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles