Journal of Military Ethics 5 (2):144-160 (2006)

This article explores the different moral and legal arguments used by protagonists in the debate about whether or not to conduct a humanitarian intervention in Darfur. The first section briefly outlines four moral and legal positions on whether there is (and should be) a right and/or duty of humanitarian intervention: communitarianism, restrictionist and counter-restrictionist legal positivism and liberal cosmopolitanism. The second section then provides an overview of the Security Council's debate about responding to Darfur's crisis, showing how its policy was influenced by both normative concerns and hard-nosed political calculations. The article concludes by asking what Darfur's case reveals about the legitimacy and likelihood of humanitarian intervention in such catastrophes and the role of the UN Security Council as the primary authorising body for the use of international force. The authors argue that this case demonstrates that for the cosmopolitan/counter-restrictionist case to prevail pivotal states need to put humanitarian emergencies on the global agenda and express a willingness to act without Council authorisation, though the question of how to proceed in cases where the Council is deadlocked remains vexed
Keywords Darfur   UN   Security Council   Humanitarian intervention  750701 Understanding international relations  360105 International Relations
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15027570600707680
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,999
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Romance of the Nation-State.David Luban - 1980 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (4):392-397.
Walzer's Theory of Morality in International Relations.Gerald Doppelt - 1978 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (1):3-26.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why the ICC Should Operate Within Peace Processes.Kenneth A. Rodman - 2012 - Ethics and International Affairs 26 (1):59-71.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Legitimacy, Humanitarian Intervention, and International Institutions.Miles Kahler - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):20-45.
Humanitarian Military Intervention: Wars for the End of History?Clifford Orwin - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):196-217.


Added to PP index

Total views
73 ( #136,554 of 2,410,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #244,706 of 2,410,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes