Law and Philosophy 31 (2):213-241 (2012)
In this article I take up a conceptual question: What is the distinction between ‘the law’ and the behavior the law regulates, or, as I formulate it, the distinction between what is ‘inside’ the law and what is ‘outside’ it? That conceptual question is in play in (at least) three different doctrinal domains: the constitutional law doctrines regarding the limits on the delegation of legislative powers; the criminal law doctrines regarding mistakes of law; and the constitutional rights doctrines that turn on the distinction between state action and the acts of non-state actors. I argue that legal doctrines should turn solely on normative considerations and should not turn on answers to conceptual questions. However, the doctrines I discuss appear to turn on the conceptual question regarding what is ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ the law. I show how each of these doctrinal areas appears to raise this conceptual issue, and I explain how the doctrines might or might not escape being held hostage to conceptual controversy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Readings in the Philosophy of Law.John Arthur & William H. Shaw (eds.) - 2010 - Pearson Prentice Hall.
The Role of Reason in the Ethics of Maimonides: Or, Why Maimonides Could Have Had a Doctrine of Natural Law Even If He Did Not.Michael P. Levine - 1986 - Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):279 - 295.
A Comparative Guide to the Western States' Public Trust Doctrines: Public Values, Private Rights, and the Evolution Toward an Ecological Public Trust.Robin Kundis Craig - unknown
The Laws of War.Jeff McMahan - 2010 - In Samantha Besson & John Tasioulas (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part.Stephen Shute & A. P. Simester (eds.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Natural Rectitude and Divine Law in Aquinas: An Approach to an Integral Interpretation of the Thomistic Doctrine of Law.Oscar James Brown - 1981 - Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
International Criminal Law and Philosophy.Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Facts, Law, Exculpation, and Inculpation: Comments on Simons.Larry Alexander - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):241-245.
The Constitution of Criminal Law: Justifications, Policing and the State's Fiduciary Duties. [REVIEW]Malcolm Thorburn - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):259-276.
Trial by Slogan: Natural Law and Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex.S. J. - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):433-449.
The Purpose of Legal Theory: Some Problems with Joseph Raz's View. [REVIEW]Paula Gaido - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (6):685-698.
Added to index2011-09-08
Total downloads39 ( #133,974 of 2,177,980 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,980 )
How can I increase my downloads?