Stephen Davis has argued that the second ontological argument fails as a theistic proof because it ignores the logical possibility of what he calls an ontologically impossible being. By an “ontologically impossible being” he means a being that does not exist, logically-possibly exists, and would exist necessarily if it existed. In this brief essay, I argue, first, that even if an OIB is logically possible, its logical possibility is irrelevant to the OA at issue; and second, that an OIB is in fact logically impossible, because the predicates which define it are inconsistent. The concept of an OIB may be coherent if necessity is understood as ontological self-sufficiency, but even so the OIB is irrelevant to the OA.
Keywords Stephen Davis  Second ontological argument  Ontologically impossible being  Necessary being
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-015-9511-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,514
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anselm's Ontological Arguments.Norman Malcolm - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (1):41-62.
Anselm: Fides Quaerens Intellectum.Karl Barth - 1960 - Richmond, Va., John Knox Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Millican on the Ontological Argument.Yujin Nagasawa - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1027-1040.
The Ontological Argument and the Devil.Yujin Nagasawa - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
Kant's Argument That Existence is Not a Determination.Nicholas Stang - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (1):583-626.
Necessary Being and the Theistic Arguments.Stephen Elliott Parrish - 1991 - Dissertation, Wayne State University
Spinoza's "Ontological" Argument.Don Garrett - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (2):198-223.
Makin on the Ontological Argument.Graham Oppy - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (255):106 - 114.
How is the Question 'is Existence a Predicate?' Relevant to the Ontological Argument?J. William Forgie - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):117 - 133.
What is a Logically Correct Argument?Michael Robert Gehman - 1990 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Makin's Ontological Argument (Again).Graham Oppy - 1993 - Philosophy 68 (264):234 - 239.


Added to PP index

Total views
81 ( #117,217 of 2,348,301 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #237,531 of 2,348,301 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes