Kiana Alikhademi, Emma Drobina, Diandra Prioleau, Brianna Richardson, Duncan Purves & Juan E. Gilbert
Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (1):1-17 (2022)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Machine Learning has become a popular tool in a variety of applications in criminal justice, including sentencing and policing. Media has brought attention to the possibility of predictive policing systems causing disparate impacts and exacerbating social injustices. However, there is little academic research on the importance of fairness in machine learning applications in policing. Although prior research has shown that machine learning models can handle some tasks efficiently, they are susceptible to replicating systemic bias of previous human decision-makers. While there is much research on fair machine learning in general, there is a need to investigate fair machine learning techniques as they pertain to the predictive policing. Therefore, we evaluate the existing publications in the field of fairness in machine learning and predictive policing to arrive at a set of standards for fair predictive policing. We also review the evaluations of ML applications in the area of criminal justice and potential techniques to improve these technologies going forward. We urge that the growing literature on fairness in ML be brought into conversation with the legal and social science concerns being raised about predictive policing. Lastly, in any area, including predictive policing, the pros and cons of the technology need to be evaluated holistically to determine whether and how the technology should be used in policing.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10506-021-09286-4 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Machine Decisions and Human Consequences.Teresa Scantamburlo, Andrew Charlesworth & Nello Cristianini - 2019 - In Karen Yeung & Martin Lodge (eds.), Algorithmic Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence’s Present and Foreseeable Impact on Lawyering, Judging, Policing and Law Enforcement.Ephraim Nissan - 2017 - AI and Society 32 (3):441-464.
What is Wrong About Robocops as Consultants? A Technology-Centric Critique of Predictive Policing.Martin Degeling & Bettina Berendt - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (3):347-356.
How to Make Decisions with Algorithms.Anders Persson & Iordanis Kavathatzopoulos - 2018 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 47 (4):122-133.
A Moral Framework for Understanding of Fair ML Through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity.Hoda Heidari - 2019 - Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 1.
Citations of this work BETA
Separating facts and evaluation: motivation, account, and learnings from a novel approach to evaluating the human impacts of machine learning.Ryan Jenkins, Kristian Hammond, Sarah Spurlock & Leilani Gilpin - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-14.
Similar books and articles
Predictive Policing and the Ethics of Preemption.Daniel Susser - 2020 - In Ben Jones & Eduardo Mendieta (eds.), The Ethics of Policing: New Perspectives on Law Enforcement. New York: Nyu Press.
What is Wrong About Robocops as Consultants? A Technology-Centric Critique of Predictive Policing.Martin Degeling & Bettina Berendt - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (3):347-356.
Algorithmic Paranoia: The Temporal Governmentality of Predictive Policing.Bonnie Sheehey - 2019 - Ethics and Information Technology 21 (1):49-58.
Ethics Beyond Transparency.Bonnie Sheehey - 2020 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):256-281.
On the Person-Based Predictive Policing of AI.Tzu-Wei Hung & Chun-Ping Yen - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3):165-176.
To Predict and to Manage. Predictive Policing in the United States.Bilel Benbouzid - 2019 - Big Data and Society 6 (1).
Algorithmic Fairness From a Non-Ideal Perspective.Sina Fazelpour & Zachary C. Lipton - 2020 - Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society.
Algorithms and Autonomy: The Ethics of Automated Decision Systems.Alan Rubel, Clinton Castro & Adam Pham - 2021 - Cambridge University Press.
The Art, Craft, and Science of Policing.Martin Innes - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press. pp. 11.
Machine Learning’s Limitations in Avoiding Automation of Bias.Daniel Varona, Yadira Lizama-Mue & Juan Luis Suárez - 2021 - AI and Society 36 (1):197-203.
The Disciplinary Power of Predictive Algorithms: A Foucauldian Perspective.Paul B. de Laat - 2019 - Ethics and Information Technology 21 (4):319-329.
The Ethics of Policing: New Perspectives on Law Enforcement.Ben Jones & Eduardo Mendieta (eds.) - 2021 - New York: NYU Press.
Ethics in Policing: Performance and the Personalization of Accountability in British Policing and Criminal Justice.Peter Neyroud - 2006 - Legal Ethics 9 (1):16.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-04-16
Total views
27 ( #423,061 of 2,506,107 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #54,072 of 2,506,107 )
2021-04-16
Total views
27 ( #423,061 of 2,506,107 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #54,072 of 2,506,107 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads