Monstrosity has its recognized place in cultural narratives but in philosophical discourse it remains mostly untouched. In my paper I make an attempt at phenomenological inquiry into the experience of the Other’s monstrous body. I am beginning with some remarks concerning Georges Canguilhem and Michel Foucault, the philosophers who devoted some attention to the problem of monstrosity and the monstrous, but my analysis is mainly based on the works of Bernhard Waldenfels, Edmund Husserl and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Waldenfels emphasizes that the corporeal self is somehow perceived as alien, always somewhat distanced and not totally graspable. He also argues that the closer the Other, the stronger activation of the boundary between the spheres of the ownness and the alienness is caused. A promising framework for the analysis of the ambivalent reaction brought about by the encounter with a monstrous human body can be provided by Husserl’s phenomenological inquiry into the process of pairing, developed in his Cartesian meditations. It seems that in this experience the pairing process is frustrating and deranged because the process of apperception is disturbed by a cluster of untypical or quite unique characteristics of the monstrous body. In result, its sense remains unclear, puzzling and challenging. Interesting light on the experience of the Other’s monstrous body could shed Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology, especially the ideas of flesh and chiasm outlined in his last work. The radical character of the monster, while does not render it something totally different from the own, elucidates, however, the contingency of the order under which the human corporeality is subsumed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.24917/20841043.11.2.4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Cartesian Meditations.Edmund Husserl - 1960 - [The Hague]M. Nijhoff.
The Structure of Behavior.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1963 - London, U.K.: Beacon Press.
Le visible et l'invisible.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1964 - Paris, France: Gallimard.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bodily Experience Between Selfhood and Otherness.Bernhard Waldenfels - 2004 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (3):235-248.
The Lesbian Body—a Monstrous or a Transcendental Signifier?Julika Funk - 2002 - In Insa Härtel & Sigrid Schade (eds.), Body and Representation. Leske + Budrich. pp. 51--57.
Posthumanism and the Monstrous Body.Margrit Shildrick - 1996 - Body and Society 2 (1):1-15.
Foucault and the Enigma of the Monster.Luciano Nuzzo - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):55-72.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,546,279 of 2,507,594 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,594 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes