What’s Wrong With the Causal Efficacy of Abstracta: A Reply to Friedell

Philosophia 51 (4):1933-1947 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The view that abstracta cannot exert causal power is pretty common in metaphysics. According to Friedell (2020), however, this view is mistaken. In a recent paper in this journal, he has argued that at least some abstracta are causally efficacious. My goal in what follows is to demonstrate that, given certain plausible methodological assumptions, Friedell 2020’s argument is not as strong as it might at first seem.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,420

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

25 (#633,404)

6 months
12 (#312,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexey Aliyev
National Research University Higher School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

When is parsimony a virtue.Michael Huemer - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):216-236.
What a musical work is.Jerrold Levinson - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (1):5-28.
Abductive Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2016 - Philosophical Forum 47 (3-4):263-280.
On what there is.W. V. O. Quine - 1948 - Review of Metaphysics 2 (5):21-38.
Overdetermination Underdetermined.Sara Bernstein - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (1):17-40.

View all 25 references / Add more references