Netiquette rules in online learning through the lens of digital citizenship scale in the post-corona era

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 21 (2):181-201 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the trending term: “Netiquette” as an important element in the effective digital citizenship. The research suggests a systematic framework of netiquette rules in the field of online education based on the classical core rules of netiquette and according to the digital citizenship scale (DCS). The research also studies the corresponding responsibilities of both educators and students to raise awareness towards using technology in a balanced, safe, smart and ethical way as the shift towards the digital activities increased significantly in the post-corona time. Design/methodology/approach The research used the qualitative data that were based on the everyday observation and analysis of the online education experience at the university of Jordan in the academic year 2020/2021; the online group discussions of students and teachers; and investigating the guidelines of the online learning netiquette rules in various academic institutes. Comparative analysis was conducted to merge and eliminate redundant rules and to add sub rules, and then to cluster them into groups. The suggested clustered groups were distributed into the classical core rules outline of netiquette. In each core rule, the sub rules were reclassified and recategorized according to the DCS by studying the complexity levels and their corresponding factors. The suggested framework updates and adds DCS levels and factors considering the exceptional experience of online education through the pandemic. Findings The research finds that “Netiquette” had been neglected in cyber ethics literature, and so it has to be rediscovered through the lens of digital citizenship that becomes very noticeable issue in the post-COVID era. So, the research presents a systematic framework that outlines more than 150 netiquette sub rules in the field of online education, and that were clustered according to DCS and the classical core rules of netiquette. It also adds a new factor to the bottom level of DCS which is the primarily skills and traits, and also updates the internet and political activism fac-tor by adding the social perspective. Originality/value A novel classification of the classical core rules of netiquette was proposed in the field of online education to serve as a spectrum of identifying the complexity of digital citizenship levels and factors. This research can be a starting point of more works on netiquette research in online education and on other fields such as online business meetings, social media networking and online gaming.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Right to Nonparticipation for Global Digital Citizenship.Andrew Iliadis - 2015 - International Review of Information Ethics 23.
An Analysis of Prospective Teachers’ Digital Citizenship Behaviour Norms.Mehmet Sincar - 2011 - International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education 1 (2):25-40.
A Study on ‘Hyo’ Ethics of Confusion in the Era of Post-Corona. 심도희 - 2022 - Journal of the New Korean Philosophical Association 109:281-294.
The history of digital ethics.Vincent C. Müller - 2023 - In Carissa Véliz (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Teaching students out of harm’s way.Esther Charlotte Moon - 2018 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 16 (3):290-302.
Digital Equity in Schools.Jo E. Williamson - 2011 - International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education 1 (1):12-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-03

Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references