HEC Forum 14 (3):197-208 (2002)
We describe how a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) process was used to develop a means of discussing end-of-life care needs of Deaf seniors. This process identified a variety of communication issues to be addressed in working with this special population. We overview the unique linguistic and cultural characteristics of this community and their implications for working with Deaf individuals to provide information for making informed decisions about end-of-life care, including completion of health care directives. Our research and our work with members of the Deaf community strongly show that communication and presentation of information should be in American Sign Language, the language of Deaf citizens
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Philosophy of Medicine Theory of Medicine/Bioethics Medical Law|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philosophy's Real-World Consequences for Deaf People: Thoughts on Iconicity, Sign Language and Being Deaf.Ernst Thoutenhoofd - 2000 - Human Studies 23 (3):261-279.
There's a Deaf Student in Your Philosophy Class—Now What?Charles E. Zimmerman Jr - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (4):421-442.
Can It Be a Good Thing to Be Deaf?Rachel Cooper - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (6):563 – 583.
The Sociomoral Reasoning and Behaviour of Deaf Children.Paul Arnold - 1993 - Journal of Moral Education 22 (2):157-166.
The Challenge of Measuring Community Values in Ways Appropriate for Setting Health Care Priorities.Peter A. Ubel - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (3):263-284.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #107,096 of 2,127,006 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #391,731 of 2,127,006 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.