South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):266-277 (2012)

Christopher John Allsobrook
University of Fort Hare
Ideology criticism, like scepticism, calls into question the objective or justified status of beliefs. However, where scepticism only refutes, and never puts forward, a substantive claim about anything, the ideology critic must maintain some criterion for distinguishing ideas which support relations of domination from those that do not, in virtue of her criticism of a particular set of ideas as “ideological”. The trouble for the ideology critic is that the sceptical methods she deploys undermine any critical thesis, including her own. Thus, the theory of ideology tends to undercut ideology criticism with a fundamental problem of self-implication. This paper draws on the epistemological problem of the criterion to explain and define a basic problem of justification for the theory of ideology. A problem of self-implication is introduced in part one. I argue that the basis for ideology criticism inevitably succumbs to the very doubt it puts forward. I draw on various criticisms of ideology criticism to formulate a specific account of the basic, fundamental problem for the theory of ideology. I show how norms for ideology criticism are vulnerable to an Ancient sceptical problem for epistemic criteria, which brings the ideology critic to a dilemma: either (i) find independent grounds for criticism, immune to ideology, or (ii) show how ideology is self-undermining. Each horn of the dilemma is ideological
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02580136.2012.10751774
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aristotle on the Liar.Paolo Crivelli - 2004 - Topoi 23 (1):61-70.
A Self for the Body.Frédérique de Vignemont - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (3):230-247.
Socratic Scepticism.Roger Wertheimer - 1993 - Metaphilosophy 24 (4):344-62.
What is Doubt and When is It Reasonable?Paul Thagard - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (Supplement):391-406.
Parliamentary Immunity: Protecting Democracy or Protecting Corruption?Simon Wigley - 2003 - Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (1):23–40.
Free Will and Reasonable Doubt.Benjamin Vilhauer - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):131-140.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #983,775 of 2,455,493 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,493 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes