Getting beyond form filling: The role of institutional governance in human research ethics [Book Review]

Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):105-116 (2008)
Abstract
It has become almost a truism to describe the interaction between research ethics committees and researchers as being marred by distrust and conflict. The ethical conduct of researchers is increasingly a matter of institutional concern because of the degree to which non-compliance with national standards can expose the entire institution to risk. This has transformed research ethics into what some have described as a research ethics industry. In an operational sense, there is considerable focus on modifying research behaviour through a combination of education and sanctions. The assessment of whether a researcher is ethical is too often based on whether they submit their work for review by an ethics committee. However, is such an approach making a useful contribution to the actual ethical conduct of research and the protection of the interests of participants? Does a focus on ethical review minimise institutional risk? Instead it has been suggested that ethics committees may be distorting or frustrating useful research and are promoting a culture of either mindless rule following or frustrated resistance. An alternative governance approach is required. There is a need for a strong institutional focus on promoting and supporting the reflective practice of researchers through every stage of their work. By situating research ethics within the broader framework of institutional governance, this paper suggests it is possible to establish arrangements that actually facilitate excellent and ethical research
Keywords Ethics committee  Institutional governance  Research ethics  Research practice  Rules
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10805-008-9057-9
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Why Ethical Codes Constitute an Unconscionable Regression.Michael Schwartz - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 23 (2):173 - 184.
Open and Closed Committees.Maureen H. Fitzgerald & Elisa Yule - 2004 - Monash Bioethics Review 23 (2).

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Is Mandatory Research Ethics Reviewing Ethical?M. Dyck & G. Allen - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):517-520.
Reassessing the Role of the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee.Merryn Ekberg - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (4):335-352.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

42 ( #118,049 of 2,143,797 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #185,774 of 2,143,797 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums