Philosophy of Science 63 (3):115 (1996)

Abstract
Acupuncture, the traditional Chinese practice of needling to alleviate pain, offers a striking case where scientific accounts in two cultures, East and West, diverge sharply. Yet the Chinese comfortably embrace the apparent ontological incommensurability. Their pragmatic posture resonates with the New Experimentalism in the West--but with some provocative differences. The development of acupuncture in China (and not in the West) further suggests general research strategies in the context of discovery. My analysis also exemplifies how one might fruitfully pursue a comparative philosophy of science that explores how other cultures investigate and validate their conclusions about the natural world
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289942
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,256
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Acupuncture, Incommensurability, and Conceptual Change.Paul Thagard & R. Zhu - 2003 - In Gale M. Sinatra & Paul R. Pintrich (eds.), Intentional Conceptual Change. L. Erlbaum. pp. 79--102.
Pseudoscience.Bradley Monton - 2013 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, Second Edition. Routledge. pp. 468-479.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
74 ( #136,681 of 2,419,601 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #191,887 of 2,419,601 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes