Inquiry 35 (1):55 – 67 (1992)
This essay examines the main line of argument of Yirmiyahu Yovel's The Adventures of Immanence. Expressing general agreement with Yovel's central thesis that Spinoza's ?immanent revolution? marked an important tuming?point in the history of modernity and profoundly influenced subsequent thought, I none the less take issue with some of the details of the story. In particular, I question his omission of Lessing, his account of the relationship between Spinoza and Kant, and his treatment of Marx. In a final section I present some objections to Yovel's guiding conception of a philosophy of immanence
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Kant's Critique of Spinoza.Henry E. Allison - 1980 - In Richard Kennington (ed.), The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza. Catholic University of America Press. pp. 199--277.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
'To Believe In This World, As It Is': Immanence and the Quest for Political Activism.Kathrin Thiele - 2010 - Deleuze Studies 4 (supplement):28-45.
The Vertigo of Immanence: Deleuze's Spinozism.Miguel de Beistegui - 2005 - Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):77-100.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads49 ( #103,915 of 2,153,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?