Routledge (2014)

Authors
Fritz Allhoff, J.D., Ph.D.
Western Michigan University
Abstract
Interest in NFIB v. Sebelius has been extraordinarily high, from as soon as the legislation was passed, through lower court rulings, the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari, and the decision itself, both for its substantive holdings and the purported behind-the-scene dynamics. Legal blogs exploded with analysis, bioethicists opined on our collective responsibilities, and philosophers tackled concepts like ‘coercion’ and the activity/inactivity distinction. This volume aims to bring together scholars from disparate fields to analyze various features of the decision. It comprises over twenty essays from a range of academic disciplines, namely law, philosophy, and political science. Essays are divided into five units: context and history, analyzing the opinions, individual liberty, Medicaid, and future implications
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
ISBN(s) 9781138731516   113873151X   9780415710268
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,466
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Ethical Evaluation of the Supreme Court Decision Regarding ERISA Interpretation.Kristin Lefebvre - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):327-334.
In Re Edna MF: Case Law Confusion in Surrogate Decision Making.Robyn S. Shapiro - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):45-54.
Best Interest: A Philosophical Critique. [REVIEW]Søren Holm & Andrew Edgar - 2008 - Health Care Analysis 16 (3):197-207.
Before the Law.Russell A. Berman - 2012 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2012 (160):3-7.
Adjudication and the Law.Timothy Endicott - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (2):311-326.
The Splendors and Miseries of Constitutional Reasoning in Times of Global Crisis: A Critical Look From the Realist Perspectives of Semiotics.Vadim Verenich - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (4):687-711.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-06

Total views
5 ( #1,119,362 of 2,374,858 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #559,821 of 2,374,858 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes