Research in Phenomenology 45 (1):53-86 (2015)

Abstract
Unlike his other fictional works Blanchot’s 1953 narrative Celui qui ne m’accompagnait pas has received comparatively little attention. The reasons for this would seem to lie in the intense abstraction of his writing in this work, which is forbidding even by his own standards, but as I will show, this intensity can be understood as comprising a singular topography of the experience of writing. Blanchot’s narrative thereby becomes a very precise and concrete form of aesthetics, which can be usefully compared to the understandings of melancholy developed by Benjamin and Adorno, but transposed into a more stringent modernist context.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15691640-12341302
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,682
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Melancholy as an Aesthetic Emotion.Emily Brady & Arto Haapala - 2003 - Contemporary Aesthetics 1.
Maurice Blanchot: The Fragment and the Whole.Lycette Nelson - 1992 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Maurice Blanchot Et la Fin du Mythe.Daniela Hurezanu - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Florida

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-01

Total views
10 ( #815,463 of 2,349,382 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,581 of 2,349,382 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes