The Resurrection of Jesus and Rational Apologetics

Philosophia Christi 10 (2):315-335 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The apologetical case for the resurrection of Jesus faces at least three difficulties. The first is that the literal resurrection of Jesus from his tomb cannot be the prototype for the eschatological fate of those whose physical bodies no longer exist. The second is that the argument for the historicity of the empty tomb is less certain than often thought. The third is that the resurrection appearances of Jesus are, in several important respects, not so different from reports of apparitions of the dead in general.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Resurrection of Jesus in Art.Ulrich Luz - 2011 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 65 (1):44-55.
Resurrection and Radical Faith.Tyson Anderson - 1973 - Religious Studies 9 (2):171 - 180.
The Place of the Resurrection in the Theology of Luke.Charles H. Talbert - 1992 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 46 (1):19-30.
The resurrection revisited.G. O'collins - 1998 - Gregorianum 79 (1):169-172.
Review of The Resurrection of God Incarnate. [REVIEW]N. N. - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (2):235-238.
John Dominic Crossan on the resurrection of Jesus.William Lane Craig - 1997 - In Stephen T. Davis, Daniel Kendall & Gerald O.’Collins (eds.), The Resurrection. Oxford Up.
The resurrection of Jesus and Roman Catholic fundamental theology.Schüssler Fiorenza & P. Francis - 1997 - In Stephen T. Davis, Daniel Kendall & Gerald O.’Collins (eds.), The Resurrection. Oxford Up. pp. 213--48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
94 (#176,872)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references