Where have all the categories gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's reading of Kant's transcendental deduction

Inquiry 43 (1):67 – 80 (2000)
This paper contains a critical analysis of the interpretation of Kant's second edition version of the Transcendental Deduction offered by Béatrice Longuenesse in her recent book: Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Though agreeing with much of Longuenesse's analysis of the logical function of judgment, I question the way in which she tends to assign them the objectifying role traditionally given to the categories. More particularly, by way of defending my own interpretation of the Deduction against some of her criticisms, I argue that Longuenesse fails to show how either part of the two-part proof may be plausibly thought to have established the necessity of the categories (as opposed to the logical functions). Finally, I question certain aspects of her 'radical' interpretation of the famous footnote at B160-1, where Kant distinguishes between 'form of intuition' and 'formal intuition'.
Keywords Kant  judgment  categories  concepts  intuition
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/002017400321370
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,685
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Reflection in Education: A Kantian Epistemology.Henk Procee - 2006 - Educational Theory 56 (3):237-253.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

190 ( #22,689 of 2,158,287 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #133,489 of 2,158,287 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums