Res Publica 25 (2):133-149 (2019)
AbstractThe paper addresses a puzzle about the proportionality requirement on self-defense due to L. Alexander. Indirectly the puzzle is also relevant to the proportionality requirement on punishment, insofar as the right to punish is derived from the right to self-defense. Alexander argues that there is no proportionality requirement on either self-defense or punishment, as long as the aggressor/offender has been forewarned of the risk of a disproportional response. To support his position Alexander appeals to some puzzle cases, challenging us to explain why the requirement applies in some of them when it clearly does not in others. The paper responds to his challenge by answering two questions: why does the proportionality requirement exist in the first place, and when does it apply? The paper argues that the requirement holds because of our need to protect our rights from violation, and that it applies to cases where the person defending his rights counts as having imposed a cost on one of the offender’s options. An account is offered of when such cost imposition occurs.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law.Victor Tadros - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
The Possibility of Choice: Three Accounts of the Problem with Coercion.Japa Pallikkathayil - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11.
The Right to Threaten and the Right to Punish.Warren Quinn - 1985 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (4):327-373.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Strict Liability and the Paradoxes of Proportionality.Leo Katz & Alvaro Sandroni - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (3):365-373.
Shortcomings of and Alternatives to the Rights-Forfeiture Theory of Justified Self-Defense and Punishment.Uwe Steinhoff - manuscript
Proportionality in Sentencing and the Restorative Justice Paradigm: 'Just Deserts' for Victims and Defendants Alike? [REVIEW]Tyrone Kirchengast - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):197-213.
When Trumps Clash: Dworkin and the Doctrine of Proportionality.Jacob Weinrib - 2017 - Ratio Juris 30 (3):341-352.
Self-Defense, Proportionality, and Defensive War Against Mitigated Aggression.Jacob Blair - 2013 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):207-224.
A Retributive Argument Against Punishment.Greg Roebuck & David Wood - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship.Grégoire Webber - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (1):179-202.
An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality and Surveillance.Kevin Macnish - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):529-548.