Hypatia 34 (4):858-868 (2019)

Authors
Ben Almassi
Governors State University
Abstract
Bruno Latour is not the only scholar to reflect on his earlier contributions to science studies with some regret and resolve over climate skepticism and science denialism. Given the ascendency of merchants of doubt, should those who share Latour's concerns join the scientists they study in circling the wagons, or is there a productive role still for science studies to question and critique scientists and scientific institutions? I argue for the latter, looking to postpositivist feminist philosophy as exemplified by Alison Wylie and Lynn Nelson, among others, as a guide. Feminist philosophers of science who ground their analysis in a detailed understanding of scientific practice are not science's champions nor its antagonists, but they do stand in a distinct relationship to science. If not merchants of doubt, are they scientific gadflies or perhaps in scientific loyal opposition? Though these notions can underwrite useful approaches to science studies, neither captures the distinctive interdependency and interestedness of feminist philosophers and science. I suggest that we would be better served by the notion of trustworthy science criticism, building on the analyses of trust and trustworthiness by Annette Baier, among others, attendant to the dynamics of interdependency in trust relationships.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/hypa.12500
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,132
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Trust and Antitrust.Annette Baier - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):231-260.
Trust as an Affective Attitude.Karen Jones - 1996 - Ethics 107 (1):4-25.
Against Method.Mark Wilson - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (1):106.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Could A Feminist Science Be?Barry R. Gross - 1994 - The Monist 77 (4):434-444.
Biological Science and Feminist Values.Michael Ruse - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:525 - 542.
Uncovering Gynocentric Science.Ruth Ginzberg - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (3):89-105.
Science Under Attack.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - The Philosopher’s Magazine 31:37-41.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-09-13

Total views
21 ( #517,638 of 2,454,732 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #226,106 of 2,454,732 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes