Ben Almassi
Governors State University
Feminist approaches to bioethics have the striking ability to usefully disrupt conversations otherwise in danger of calcifying into immovable opposing camps. Take, for instance, debates between theorists in disability studies and bioethicists who often take two different approaches to understanding disability. On one side are those such as Buchanan, Brock, Daniels, and Wikler (2000) who seek to locate the apparent functional deficiency of disability in biologically abnormal bodies. Let us call this a normal functioning approach to understanding disability. On the other side are those such as Amundson (2000a; 2005) who argue that to be paraplegic or deaf is not to be inherently deficient but different in ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/fab.2010.3.2.126
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,159
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Vagaries of the Natural Lottery? Human Diversity, Disability and Justice: A Capability Perspective.Lorella Terzi - 2009 - In Kimberley Brownlee & Adam Cureton (eds.), Disability and Disadvantage. Oxford University Press. pp. 86--111.
Disability, Minority, and Difference.Elizabeth Barnes - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):337-355.
Sensing Disability.Mairian Corker - 2001 - Hypatia 16 (4):34-52.


Added to PP index

Total views
241 ( #41,575 of 2,454,833 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,284 of 2,454,833 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes