On Modal Arguments against Perfect Goodness

In Mirosław Szatkowski (ed.), Ontology of Divinity. De Gruyter. pp. 183-194 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is commonly believed that intrinsically bad possible worlds are inconsistent with the perfect goodness of God. A perfectly good being could not exist in possible worlds that are intrinsically bad. Indeed it is widely believed that possible worlds that are insufficiently good are inconsistent with a perfectly good God. Modal atheological arguments aim to show that, since the pluriverse includes intrinsically bad worlds and insufficiently good worlds, there necessarily does not exist a perfectly good God. I show that modal atheological arguments are in general invalid. Modal atheological arguments fail to show that there exists no perfectly good God even on the assumption that there are extremely bad worlds in the pluriverse. Modal atheological arguments depend entirely on the logic of modality in S5. But the logic of S5 ensures that a perfectly good God is consistent with extremely bad possible worlds and so guarantees that a perfectly good God is consistent with a plenitudinous pluriverse.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reverse Ontological Argument.James Henry Collin - 2022 - Analysis 82 (3):410-416.
Ontological Arguments.Peter van Inwagen - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 357–367.
Perfect Being Theology and Modal Truth.Jeff Speaks - 2016 - Faith and Philosophy 33 (4):465-473.
Modal theistic arguments.Graham Oppy - 1993 - Sophia 32 (2):17-24.
Is God Perfectly Good In Islam.Seyma Yazici - 2022 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 18 (2):(SI9)5-33.
Modal Logic vs. Ontological Argument.Andrezej Biłat - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):179--185.
Goodness.Paul Helm - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 263–269.
A Posteriori Anselmianism.Michael J. Almeida - 2017 - Topoi 36 (4):599-607.
On Perfect Goodness.J. Gregory Keller - 2010 - Sophia 49 (1):29-36.
Modal Ontological Arguments.Gregory R. P. Stacey - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (8):e12938.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-30

Downloads
79 (#211,490)

6 months
79 (#60,589)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mike Almeida
University of Texas at San Antonio

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Evil is not Evidence.Mike Almeida - 2022 - Religious Studies 1 (1):1-9.
Necessity, Theism, and Evidence.Mike Almeida - 2022 - Logique Et Analyse 259 (1):287-307.
On Necessary Gratuitous Evils.Michael James Almeida - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):117-135.

View all 6 references / Add more references