Partner Gender Differences in Prestige of Clients Served at the Largest U.S. Audit Firms

Journal of Business Ethics 173 (2):401-421 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite tremendous investment to promote gender equity, U.S. public accounting firms continue to be gendered organizations. Our archival study examines gender equity within the partnership of these large firms for a one-year period. We find female partners are clustered in lower prestige client types including investment funds, benefit plans, and single audits, rather than higher prestige public company clients. Second, we consider whether there is gender bias in prestige of client served by female partners who lead public company audits. In these tests of those individuals who have already achieved the partnership and lead public company audits, we find no evidence of bias. This research contributes to the understanding of gender bias in U.S. public accounting firms and helps inform the societal narrative on where women continue to be marginalized even when they have achieved the highest levels in an organization.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Local Gambling Norms and Audit Pricing.Jeffrey L. Callen & Xiaohua Fang - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 164 (1):151-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-09

Downloads
17 (#846,424)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?