Replies [Book Review]

Joseph Almog
University of Turku
Lucky is the writer whose commentators combine perceptiveness and grace. My two commentators delved deeply into the framework I assume in WAI. Where they see gaps, they elegantly nudge the discussion towards needed extensions/clarifications. Both use the monograph to launch searching metaphysical questions—about method and content. I will take up matters of method first, then turn to specific questions in the interpretation of Descartes and the metaphysics of essence/necessity/conceivability.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00425.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

‘Many Minds’ Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: Replies to Replies.Michael Lockwood - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):445-461.
Replies to My Critics.Samir Okasha - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (3):425-431.
Replies to Eleven Essays.W. V. Quine - 1981 - Philosophical Topics 12 (1):227-243.
Replies.Joseph Agassi - 1975 - Synthese 30 (1-2):33 - 38.


Added to PP index

Total views
48 ( #235,762 of 2,505,144 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,144 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes