Replies [Book Review]
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3):717–734 (2005)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Lucky is the writer whose commentators combine perceptiveness and grace. My two commentators delved deeply into the framework I assume in WAI. Where they see gaps, they elegantly nudge the discussion towards needed extensions/clarifications. Both use the monograph to launch searching metaphysical questions—about method and content. I will take up matters of method first, then turn to specific questions in the interpretation of Descartes and the metaphysics of essence/necessity/conceivability.
|
Keywords | Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy of Mind |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0031-8205 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00425.x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Evolution, Neutrality, and Antecedent Probability: A Reply to Van Till and McMullin.Alvin Plantinga - 1991 - Christian Scholar's Review 21 (1):80-109.
‘Many Minds’ Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: Replies to Replies.Michael Lockwood - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):445-461.
Agents and Acacias: Replies to Dennett, Sterelny, and Queller.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):501-515.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
48 ( #235,762 of 2,505,144 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,144 )
2009-01-28
Total views
48 ( #235,762 of 2,505,144 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,144 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads