Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):206-220 (2017)

Authors
Ben Almassi
Governors State University
Abstract
Conflict of interest disclosure has become a routine requirement in communication of scientific information. Its advocates defend COI disclosure as a sensible middle path between the extremes of categorical prohibition on for-profit research and anything-goes acceptance of research regardless of origin. To the extent that COI information is meant to aid reviewer and reader evaluation of research, COIs must be epistemologically significant. While some commentators treat COIs as always relevant to research credibility, others liken the demand for disclosure to an ad hominem attack, impugning integrity when better evidence of research credibility is available. Kevin Elliott has argued for clearer justification of COI relevance to research credibility: some interests may be feared to corrupt research results, while others do not, and Elliott provides criteria to discern which financial COIs are actually relevant to research credibility. In this article, I seek to revise and extend Elliott's proposed criteria to COIs more widely. Specifically, I consider the relevance of financial interests as well as nonfinancial advocacy interests to the credibility of research into environmental equity as funded by industry and community groups, with particular attention to criticism and defence of the 1987 United Church of Christ study on the racial demographics of toxic waste facility siting in the United States.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.12180
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,159
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Troublesome Semantics of Conflict of Interest.Paul J. Friedman - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):245 – 251.
The Greening of Bioethics: Corporate Funding of Bioethics Research.Leigh Turner - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):326-328.
The Impact of Conflict of Interest on Trust in Science.Paul J. Friedman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):413-420.
Conflicts of Interest in Science.David B. Resnik - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (4):381-408.
Conflicts of Interest in Research Funding.Michael Nurokand Carl C. Hug Jr - 2010 - In G. A. van Norman, S. Jackson, S. H. Rosenbaum & S. K. Palmer (eds.), Clinical Ethics in Anesthesiology. Cambridge University Press.
Conflict of Interest: The Importance of Potential. [REVIEW]Dr Imogen Evans - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):393-396.
Conflict of Interest: The Importance of Potential.Imogen Evans - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):393-396.
Charitable Conflicts of Interest.Chris MacDonald, Michael McDonald & Wayne Norman - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2):67 - 74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-07

Total views
15 ( #678,613 of 2,454,833 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,284 of 2,454,833 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes