The subject-predicate class I

Noûs 25 (5):591-619 (1991)
Authors
Joseph Almog
University of Turku
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2215634
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,905
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Russellians Can Have a No Proposition View of Empty Names.Thomas Hodgson - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (7):670-691.
Gappy Propositions?Seyed N. Mousavian - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):125-157.
Strongde Re Belief.Torin Alter - 2001 - Philosophia 28 (1-4):223-232.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Bad Is Rape?H. E. Baber - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (2):125-138.
No Problem for Aristotle's Subject and Predicate.Guy Politzer - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):298-299.
Is H2O a Liquid, or Water a Gas?Scott Soames - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):635-639.
Maybe There Are No Subject-Predicate Sentences in Chinese.Xiaoqiang Han - 2009 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (3):277-287.
Existential Assumptions for Aristotelian Logic.Phillip H. Wiebe - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:321-328.
The Subject-Predicate Class II.Joseph Almog - 1991 - Noûs 25 (5):621-638.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
46 ( #140,643 of 2,293,829 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #108,420 of 2,293,829 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature