Phronesis 49 (1):24 - 40 (2004)

In this paper I discuss the dialogues between 'Protagoras', Theodorus and Socrates in "Theaetetus" 161-171 and emphasise the importance for this passage of a dilemma which refutation is shown to pose for relativism at 161e-162a. I argue that the two speeches delivered on Protagoras' behalf contain material that is deeply Socratic and suggest that this feature of the speeches should be interpreted as part of Plato's philosophical case against relativism, reflecting the relativist's own inability to defend his theory from attempts to refute it. I then discuss Theodorus' role in the refutation of Protagoras and argue that his voice is needed to get relativism disproved in the self-refutation argument of 171a-c. I conclude with a brief discussion of the image of Protagoras at 171d
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156852804773617398
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,016
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Plato's Theaetetus.Gail Fine & David Bostock - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (4):687.
Philosophical Reasoning.Henry W. Johnstone - 1962 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23 (2):287-288.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
162 ( #58,326 of 2,403,691 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #255,955 of 2,403,691 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes