Reasons for Reliance
Ethics 126 (2):311-338 (2016)
| Authors |
Facundo M. Alonso
Miami University, Ohio
|
| Abstract |
Philosophers have in general offered only a partial view of the normative grounds of reliance. Some maintain that either one of evidence or of pragmatic considerations has a normative bearing on reliance, but are silent about whether the other kind of consideration has such a bearing on it as well. Others assert that both kinds of considerations have a normative bearing on reliance, but sidestep the question of what their relative normative bearing is. My aim in this article is to offer a more systematic and comprehensive view of reasons for reliance.
|
| Keywords | reliance belief reasons pragmatic considerations evidence |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2016 |
| DOI | 10.1086/683536 |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Reliance, Trust, and Belief.Peter Railton - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):122-150.
Citations of this work BETA
Intending, Settling, and Relying.Facundo M. Alonso - 2017 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility. Volume 4. Oxford University Press. pp. 50-74.
A Dual Aspect Theory of Shared Intention.Facundo M. Alonso - 2016 - Journal of Social Ontology 2 (2):271–302.
Requirements of Intention in Light of Belief.Carlos Núñez - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-22.
Reductive Views of Shared Intention.Facundo M. Alonso - 2017 - In Kirk Ludwig & Marija Jankovic (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Collective Intentionality. Routledge.
View all 12 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Are Epistemic Reasons Ever Reasons to Promote?Clayton Littlejohn - 2013 - Logos and Episteme 4 (3):353-360.
The Possibility of Pragmatic Reasons for Belief and the Wrong Kind of Reasons Problem.Andrew Reisner - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (2):257 - 272.
Simulating Rational Social Normative Trust, Predictive Trust, and Predictive Reliance Between Agents.Maj Tuomela & Solveig Hofmann - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (3):163-176.
A Short Refutation of Strict Normative Evidentialism.Andrew E. Reisner - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (5):1-9.
Pragmatic Reasons for Belief.Andrew Reisner - 2018 - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford University Press.
Weighing Pragmatic and Evidential Reasons for Belief.Andrew Reisner - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (1):17 - 27.
Emerson's Argument for Self-Reliance as a Significant Factor in a Flourishing Life.Kathleen O'Dwyer - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 2 (1):102-110.
Reasons for Belief, Reasons for Action, the Aim of Belief, and the Aim of Action.Daniel Whiting - 2014 - In Clayton Littlejohn & John Turri (eds.), Epistemic Norms: New Essays on Action, Belief, and Assertion. Oxford University Press.
On the Attitude of Trust.Lars Hertzberg - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):307 – 322.
Against Belief Normativity.Kathrin Glüer & Åsa Wikforss - 2013 - In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press.
Renovating Dependency and Self-Reliance for Participatory Sustainable Development.Nancy Grudens-Schuck, Will Allen, Tasha M. Hargrove & Margaret Kilvington - 2003 - Agriculture and Human Values 20 (1):53-64.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-04-08
Total views
203 ( #36,055 of 2,273,203 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #162,000 of 2,273,203 )
2015-04-08
Total views
203 ( #36,055 of 2,273,203 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #162,000 of 2,273,203 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
