Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning

Cornell University Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

William P. Alston. difference in the scope of the rule reflects the fact that I-rules exist for the sake of making communication possible. Whereas their cousins are enacted and enforced for other reasons. We could distinguish I-rules just by this ...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Illocutionary forces and what is said.M. Kissine - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (1):122-138.
Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning.S. V. Bokil - 2003 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 30 (2):347-355.
Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts.Jessica Rett - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (5):411-442.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-27

Downloads
179 (#106,167)

6 months
12 (#200,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Lying with Presuppositions.Emanuel Viebahn - 2020 - Noûs 54 (3):731-751.
Truth and assertion: rules vs aims.Neri Marsili - 2018 - Analysis 78 (4):638–648.
Linguistic Mistakes.Indrek Reiland - 2023 - Erkenntnis 88 (5):2191-2206.
Hedged Assertion.Matthew A. Benton & Peter Van Elswyk - 2018 - In Sanford C. Goldberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford University Press. pp. 245-263.

View all 50 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references