On Quine on Carnap on Ontology

Philosophical Studies 102 (1):93 - 122 (2001)

Authors
Marc Alspector-Kelly
Western Michigan University
Abstract
W. V. Quine assumed that in _Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology Rudolf Carnap was attempting to dodge commitment to abstract entities--without either renouncing quantification over them or demonstrating their dispensability--by wielding the analytic/synthetic distinction against ontological issues. Quine's interpretation of Carnap's intent--and his criticism of it--is widely endorsed. But Carnap objected, I argue, not to abstract entities, but to his critics' suggestion that empiricism implies nominalism. Quine's and Carnap's views are therefore more akin than Quine ever suspected. Unfortunately, Quine's misinterpretation of Carnap's position has led to a misunderstanding of the implications of Quine's own naturalistic turn for contemporary ontology
Keywords W.V. Quine  Rudolf Carnap  Ontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1010353825006
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Quine's Monism and Modal Eliminativism in the Realm of Superveniences.Atilla Akalın - 2019 - International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research (JSHRS) 6 (34):795-800.
Carnap's Metaontology.Matti Eklund - 2013 - Noûs 47 (2):229-249.
Choosing the Realist Framework.Stathis Psillos - 2011 - Synthese 180 (2):301 - 316.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

‘Two Dogmas’ -- All Bark and No Bite?Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633 - 648.
Ontology, Analyticity, and Meaning : The Quine-Carnap Dispute.Scott Soames - 2009 - In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 424--43.
Carnap and Translational Indeterminacy.William H. Berge - 1995 - Synthese 105 (1):115 - 121.
Putting the Bite Back Into 'Two Dogmas'.Paul Gregory - 2003 - Principia 7 (1-2):115-129.
Every Dogma has its Day.Richard Creath - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):347-389.
‘Two Dogmas’ -- All Bark and No Bite?Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
Empirical Equivalence in the Quine-Carnap Debate.Eric J. Loomis - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
159 ( #46,429 of 2,260,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #76,555 of 2,260,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature