Topoi 14 (2):135-148 (1995)

Theism is a metaphysical theory. But the typical adherent of a theistic religion does not hold theism as a theory, even though she is committed to various propositions that could enter into such a theory. Attention is given to the kind of theory theism is, when it is a theory. As far as religion is concerned, the main importance of the question as to whether theism is a theory concerns the issue as to whether the success of theism as a theory is relevant to the justifiability of the beliefs of a theistic religion. I argue that there is such a relevance. But whether, more specifically, such beliefs are unjustified unless theism can provide an adequate explanation of evil depends on whether theism is responsible for providing such an explanation. I argue that it is not
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00769719
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,586
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Retreat Argument.Hans Van Eyghen - 2018 - Heythrop Journal (3):497-508.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
117 ( #79,492 of 2,348,601 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,295 of 2,348,601 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes