AbstractThe present work is to be a critique of Rawls’ Veil of Ignorance as well as putting forth an alternative analytical tool when constructing societies known as the L’echelle Naturelle. My paper hopes to argue that inequalities in a society are not only essential in society contrary to Rawls’ Egalitarian ideology, but do in fact contain equality so long as the autonomy of the citizen is fully exercisable. I contend that institutions such as government and their extensions namely the law, have debilitated the exercisability of autonomy. The consequence of that is an artificial hierarchy monopolized by a minority rather than a natural hierarchy where every citizen is a means unto themselves. The phenomenon of a natural hierarchy that is made possible by unchained autonomy is what the L’echelle Naturelle hopes to expound upon in the forthcoming work.
Similar books and articles
Social Justice, Genomic Justice and the Veil of Ignorance: Harsanyi Meets Mendel.Samir Okasha - 2012 - Economics and Philosophy 28 (1):43-71.
Public Relations and Rawls: An Ill-Fitting Veil to Wear.Chris Roberts - 2012 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27 (3):163-176.
Freeman and Evan: Stakeholder Theory in the Original Position.Alexei M. Marcoux - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (2):207-224.
The Veil of Ignorance and Health Resource Allocation.Carlos Soto - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (4):387-404.
An Extension of Rawls' Theory of Justice to Environmental Ethics.Brent A. Singer - 1988 - Environmental Ethics 10 (3):217-231.
A Defense of the Maximin Principle in Rawls' Theory of Justice.Robert C. Robinson - 2009 - Humanity and Social Science Journal 4 (2):175-179.
Egalitarianism Against the Veil of Ignorance.John E. Roemer - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy 99 (4):167-184.
Rawls, Animals and Justice: New Literature, Same Response. [REVIEW]Robert Garner - 2012 - Res Publica 18 (2):159-172.
Reiman’s Libertarian Interpretation of Rawls’ Difference Principle.Lawrence Alexander - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:13-18.
The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality.Percy B. Lehning - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
Rawls' Two Principles of Justice: Their Adoption by Rational Self-Interested Individuals. In a Theory of Justice.Alexandra Dobra - 2010 - E-Logos Electronic Journal for Philosophy 1:2-7.
Rowlands, Rawlsian Justice and Animal Experimentation.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):569-587.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads