Debating Pornography

New York, US: Oup Usa (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pornography is everywhere, and it raises a host of difficult questions. What counts as pornography, first of all? When does material cross the line from being erotic to being objectionable? Where does a person's entitlement to sexual freedom end and another person's right not to feel objectified begin? How should rights be weighed against consequences in deciding what laws and policies ought to be adopted? Philosophers Andrew Altman and Lori Watson explore these and other issues in this succinct and readable for-and-against volume.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-18

Downloads
110 (#192,248)

6 months
18 (#155,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Feminist perspectives on objectification.Evangelia Papadaki - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ideal Theory for a Complex World.Jeffrey Carroll - 2022 - Res Publica 28 (3):531-550.
Feminist political philosophy.Noëlle McAfee - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pornography Conceptualised as an Addictive Substance.Shirah Theron - 2023 - Dissertation, University of Stellenbosch

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references