Faith and Philosophy 19 (1):47-57 (2002)
Some argue that God’s omnipotence and moral perfection prevent God from being afraid and having evil desires and thus from understanding such states—which contradicts God’s omniscience. But, I argue, God could acquire such understanding indirectly, either by (i) perceiving the mental states of imperfect creatures, (ii) imaginatively combining the components of mental states with which God could be acquainted, or (iii) having false memory traces of such states. (i)–(iii) are consistent with the principal divine attributes.
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Is God a Zombie? Divine Consciousness and Omnipresence.Raphaël Millière - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (1):38-54.
Thomas Versus Thomas: A New Approach to Nagel's Bat Argument.Yujin Nagasawa - 2003 - Inquiry 46 (3):377-395.
Omniscience and Worthiness of Worship.Wesley D. Cray - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):147-153.
Similar books and articles
Gersonides: Judaism Within the Limits of Reason.Seymour Feldman - 2010 - Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
Divine Omniscience and Experience: A Reply to Alter.Yujin Nagasawa - 2003 - Ars Disputandi 3.
The Divine Essence and the Conception of God in Spinoza.Sherry Deveaux - 2003 - Synthese 135 (3):329 - 338.
Mercy and Justice in St. Anselm's Proslogion.Gregory B. Sadler - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):41-61.
A Physicalist Rejoinder to Some Problems with Omniscience; or, How God Could Know What We Know.Jason A. Beyer - 2004 - Sophia 43 (2):5-13.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads77 ( #67,539 of 2,163,682 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,898 of 2,163,682 )
How can I increase my downloads?