Heythrop Journal 62 (2):1-16 (2021)

Authors
Carlo Alvaro
New York City College of Technology (CUNY)
Abstract
Explicit atheism is a philosophical position according to which belief in God is irrational, and thus it should be rejected. In this paper, I revisit, extend, and defend against the most telling counter arguments the Kalām Cosmological Argument in order to show that explicit atheism must be deemed as a positively irrational position.
Keywords Kalām  Atheism   God  Deism  Big Bang
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2022
DOI 10.1111/heyj.13978
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Evil and Omnipotence.J. L. Mackie - 1955 - Mind 64 (254):200-212.
The Kalām Cosmological Argument.W. Craig - 1980 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):408-411.
The Evil-God Challenge.Stephen Law - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (3):353 - 373.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology.Graham Oppy - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):125-133.
Causation and Sufficient Reason (Atheism).Felipe Leon - 2019 - In Joseph W. Koterski & Graham Oppy (eds.), Theism and Atheism: Opposing Viewpoints in Philosophy. MacMillan Reference.
Kalam Cosmological Arguments for Atheism.Quentin Smith - 2007 - In Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 192--194.
Atheism and Inferential Bias.Kelly James Clark - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (2):43-56.
Undermining the Case for Evidential Atheism.Paul K. Moser - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (1):83 - 93.
Arguments for Atheism.Graham Oppy - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press. pp. 53.
Atheism and Epistemic Justification.J. Angelo Corlett & Josh Cangelosi - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (1):91-106.
Atheism, Naturalism, and Morality.Louise Antony - 2020 - In Raymond Arragon & Michael Peterson (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion, 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 66-78.
Final Reckoning: Atheism.Graham Oppy - 2019 - In Joseph Koterski & Graham Oppy (eds.), Theism and Atheism: Opposing Viewpoints in Philosophy. Farmington Hills, MI, USA: pp. 679-94.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-03-30

Total views
193 ( #59,492 of 2,498,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
86 ( #8,557 of 2,498,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes