The early Arabic liar: the liar paradox in the Islamic world from the mid-ninth to the mid-thirteenth centuries CE
Vivarium 47 (1):97-127 (2009)
AbstractWe describe the earliest occurrences of the Liar Paradox in the Arabic tradition. e early Mutakallimūn claim the Liar Sentence is both true and false; they also associate the Liar with problems concerning plural subjects, which is somewhat puzzling. Abharī (1200-1265) ascribes an unsatisfiable truth condition to the Liar Sentence—as he puts it, its being true is the conjunction of its being true and false—and so concludes that the sentence is not true. Tūsī (1201-1274) argues that self-referential sentences, like the Liar, are not truth-apt, and defends this claim by appealing to a correspondence theory of truth. Translations of the texts are provided as an appendix.
Similar books and articles
On the storeyed revenge of strengthened liars, and the contrary finality of no-proposition resolutions.Jordan Howard Sobel - manuscript
Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox.J. C. Beall (ed.) - 2007 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Free assumptions and the liar paradox.Patrick Greenough - 2001 - American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (2):115 - 135.
The liar paradox, expressibility, possible languages.Matti Eklund - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The liar paradox in fifteenth-century Shiraz: the exchange between Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Dashtakī and Jalāl al-Dīn al-Dawānī.Khaled El-Rouayheb - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (2):251-275.
Al-Taftāzānī on the Liar Paradox.David Sanson & Ahmed Alwishah - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 4 (1).
References found in this work
The Liar Paradox from John Buridan back to Thomas Bradwardine.Stephen Read - 2002 - Vivarium 40 (2):189-218.