Mad, Martian, but not mad Martian pain
Sorites 15 (December):73-75 (2004)
Functionalism cannot accommodate the possibility of mad pain—pain whose causes and effects diverge from those of the pain causal role. This is because what it is to be in pain according to functionalism is simply to be in a state that occupies the pain role. And the identity theory cannot accommodate the possibility of Martian pain—pain whose physical realization is foot-cavity inflation rather than C-fibre activation (or whatever physiological state occupies the pain-role in normal humans). After all, what it is to be in pain according to the identity theory is to be in whatever state that occupies the pain role for us.
|Keywords||Functionalism Identity Metaphysics Mind Pain Lewis, D|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Are Qualia a Pain in the Neck for Functionalists?George Graham & G. Lynn Stephens - 1985 - American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (January):73-80.
On the Supposed Utility of a Folk Theory of Pain.Donald F. Gustafson - 2000 - Brain and Mind 1 (2):223-228.
Functionalism and Type-Type Identity Theories.Frank Jackson, Robert Pargetter & E. W. Prior - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 42 (September):209-25.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads174 ( #26,342 of 2,171,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?