Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (4):429-447 (2007)

Amalia Amaya
National Autonomous University Of Mexico
This paper argues that formal models of coherence are useful for constructing a legal epistemology. Two main formal approaches to coherence are examined: coherence-based models of belief revision and the theory of coherence as constraint satisfaction. It is shown that these approaches shed light on central aspects of a coherentist legal epistemology, such as the concept of coherence, the dynamics of coherentist justification in law, and the mechanisms whereby coherence may be built in the course of legal decision-making
Keywords Legal epistemology  Coherence  Belief revision  Constraint satisfaction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10506-007-9050-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,893
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reason, Truth and History.Kathleen Okruhlik - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (4):692-694.
Conceptual Revolutions.Paul THAGARD - 1992 - Princeton University Press.
Thagard’s Coherentism. [REVIEW]Majid Amini - 2000 - Philosophical Books 43 (2):136-140.
Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 58 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Legal Justification by Optimal Coherence.Amalia Amaya - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (3):304-329.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
137 ( #66,033 of 2,342,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #332,910 of 2,342,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes