Slip-Proof Actions

In Roman Altshuler Michael J. Sigrist (ed.), Time and the Philosophy of Action. New York: Routledge. pp. 21-36 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most human actions are complex, but some of them are basic. Which are these? In this paper, I address this question by invoking slips, a common kind of mistake. The proposal is this: an action is basic if and only if it is not possible to slip in performing it. The argument discusses some well-established results from the psychology of language production in the context of a philosophical theory of action. In the end, the proposed criterion is applied to discuss some well-known theories of basic actions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Basic Actions and Individuation.Constantine Sandis - 2010 - In Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 10–17.
Does Philosophy of Action Rest on a Mistake?Andrew Sneddon - 2001 - Metaphilosophy 32 (5):502-522.
Basic Mistakes in Performance.Kim Frost - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 44:17-21.
Ways and Means.Annetie C. Baier - 1972 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):275 - 293.
"How to Think Several Thoughts at Once: Content Plurality in Mental Action".Antonia Peacocke - 2019 - In Michael Brent & Lisa Miracchi Titus (eds.), Mental Action and the Conscious Mind. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 31-60.
Combinations of Stit and Actions.Ming Xu - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (4):485-503.
The divisibility of basic actions.Kevin Lynch - 2017 - Analysis 77 (2):312-318.
Joint attention in joint action.Anika Fiebich & Shaun Gallagher - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (4):571-87.
Action, activity, agent.Sebastián Briceño - 2015 - In Patricia Hanna (ed.), An Anthology of Philosophical Studies: Volume 9. Athens Institute for Education and Research. pp. 15–27.
Action and Reaction: The Two Voices of Inner Speech.Tom Frankfort - 2022 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy (1):51-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-29

Downloads
375 (#63,458)

6 months
101 (#67,173)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Santiago Amaya
University of the Andes

Citations of this work

Basic Actions Reloaded.Santiago Amaya - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (9):e12435.
Why value values?Murray Samuel - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:e54.
What it takes to make a word.Wade Munroe - 2022 - Synthese 200 (4):1-30.

Add more citations