In Beatriz Bossi & Thomas M. Robinson (eds.), Plato's Sophist Revisited. de Gruyter. pp. 247-268 (2013)

David Ambuel
Mary Washington College
It is argued that the analysis by which the gene are differentiated in the dialogue is an exercise in studied ambiguities informed by an Eleatic logic of strict dichotomy that was the underpinning of the Sophist's method of division. By this dialectical drill, Plato shows that the metaphysics underlying the Visitor's method fails to adequately distinguish what it means to have a character from what it means to be a character, and therefore remains inadequate to track down the sophist or to distinguish him from the philosopher: Eleaticism, as critically examined by Plato, proves to be means to disguise, not to discover the sophist
Keywords Plato  Sophist  Greatest Kinds  Megista Gene
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No-Existing Beings: Phantasmata in Plato.Barbara Botter - 2016 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 18:113-149.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
699 ( #11,196 of 2,519,513 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #13,282 of 2,519,513 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes