Russian Studies in Philosophy 20 (3):25-59 (1981)
One of the most important philosophical principles in contemporary natural science is the principle of the universality of evolutionary development , which was argued with much force and depth in F. Engels's The Dialectics of Nature. For the more than a century that has passed since Engels's sweeping synthesis of knowledge in the natural sciences, his revelation of the unity of the processes of evolution in inanimate and animate nature, including the inevitably and law-governed appearance of its "highest flower, the thinking mind," where appropriate conditions for that appearance arise, this principle of development has assisted in the achievement of many impressive advances. The general outlines of the evolutionary process of nature, in its infinite diversity, are now emerging in ever sharper relief, although our knowledge of that process still contains many rather serious lacunae. It is significant to note that the progress of natural science leads not only to modifications but often even to radical revisions of many notions about the evolution of nature, including those that seemed unchallengeable
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Evolutionary Approaches to Epistemic Justification.Helen de Cruz, Maarten Boudry, Johan de Smedt & Stefaan Blancke - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (4):517-535.
Methodological Problems in Evolutionary Biology. XIII. Evolution and Knowledge.Wim J. van der Steen - 2000 - Acta Biotheoretica 48 (1):73-84.
An Epistemological Problem for Evolutionary Psychology.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):47-63.
Intentionality in Nature. Against an All-Encompassing Evolutionary Paradigm: Evolutionary and Cognitive Processes Are Not Instances of the Same Process.Henri Atlan - 1994 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 24 (1):67–87.
Bruno on the Morality of the Inhabitants of the Infinite Universe and on the Cognitive Passion of Copernicus.Waldemar Voisé & Antoni Szymanowski - 1979 - Dialectics and Humanism 6 (2):115-123.
Is Cognition Enough to Explain Cognitive Development?Linda B. Smith & Adam Sheya - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):725-735.
The Meaning of Life in a Developing Universe.John E. Stewart - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (4):395-409.
The Evolutionary Origins of Cognitive Control.Thomas T. Hills - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):231-237.
The Emergence of Consciousness: BUC Versus SOC.Ron Sun - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):355-356.
Natural Selection and Moral Sentiment.Charles W. Wright - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:459-467.
Attention and Alerting: Cognitive Processes Spared in Blindsight.Robert W. Kentridge & Charles A. Heywood - 2001 - In Beatrice De Gelder, Edward H. F. De Haan & Charles A. Heywood (eds.), Out of Mind: Varieties of Unconscious Processes. Oxford University Press. pp. 163-181.
The Explanatory Limits of Cognitive Archaeology.Ben Jeffares - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):410-412.
Why the Analyses of Cognitive Processes Matter.Ulrich Hoffrage - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):679-680.
Cognitive Control Processes and Hypnosis.Tobias Egner & Amir Raz - 2007 - In Graham A. Jamieson (ed.), Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Oxford University Press. pp. 29-50.
Added to index2010-12-11
Total downloads5 ( #603,809 of 2,177,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,489 of 2,177,979 )
How can I increase my downloads?