Abstract
More than three decades after its introduction as a legal requirement for medical treatment in the clinical setting, informed consent continues to be viewed with skepticism as to its need or effectiveness. Some maintain that it is not required because the ordinary individual believes that doctors can be trusted to behave In the best interests of their patients. This issue will be discussed in a later portion of this article. Others are persuaded that informed consent is an unattainable ideal given the limited capacity of the ordinary individual to understand the relevant information. This view is supported by studies intended to show that satisfactory understanding on the part of patients cannot be achieved. In rebuttal, Apple-baum, Lidz, and Meisel observed that:Such statements are easily refuted by reference to studies of situations in which reasonable comprehension actually has been achieved. A sounder interpretation of all these studies might be that patients and subjects can attain a good level of understanding in many cases, but that several factors — including the manner in which disclosure is made as well as patients' limitations — may get in the way
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0963180100006952
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Transparency: Informed Consent in Primary Care.Howard Brody - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (5):5-9.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Cultural Context and Consent: An Anthropological View.M. Patrão Neves - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):93-98.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consent and Informational Responsibility.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
Informed Consent Revisited: Japan and the U.S.Akira Akabayashi & Brian Taylor Slingsby - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):9 – 14.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2009 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics.Neil C. Manson - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Can Broad Consent Be Informed Consent?M. Sheehan - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):226-235.
Informed Consent as Waiver: The Doctrine Rethought?Emma C. Bullock - 2010 - Ethical Perspectives 17 (4):529-555.
Collective Informed Consent and Decision Power.Jukka Varelius - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):39-50.
Informed Consent in the Genetic Age.Amnon Goldworth - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):393-400.
Informed Consent in the Human Genome Enterprise.Amnon Goldworth - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (3):296.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
13 ( #772,533 of 2,519,697 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,697 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes