Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):241-247 (2004)

Authors
Abstract
Parents’ freedom to choose infant male circumcision is the correct policyIndividuals and groups lobbying to have infant male circumcision prohibited or restricted often argue that the practice of routinely circumcising infants is unjustified. For instance, in this issue of the journal, John Hutson argues that it is virtually impossible to justify a policy in which the medical establishment should be able to embark on a “mass circumcision” campaign of 100% of the infant male population [see page 238].1Indeed, I would be hard pressed to find anyone who could rationally disagree with this contention. However, this is because no one is currently arguing for the enactment of a policy that stipulates that all healthy male infants should be routinely circumcised . Arguments seeking to support a prohibition of “routine infant circumcision”, such as the one by Hutson, are arguing against a straw man—and a pitiful one at that.2 Such arguments only serve to misconstrue the debate and avoid engaging in the real and pressing issues concerning the legitimacy of the provision of this procedure.The questions that should be considered, and the ones which I shall be interested in discussing here, are what reasons are justifiable for allowing parents to choose to have their son circumcised? After well informed and careful deliberation should parents have the freedom to choose to have their son circumcised? These are the most relevant questions to be considered because there is a growing collection of citizens, medical practitioners, and lawyers who are currently lobbying for the practice of infant male circumcision to be outlawed—for example, there is a bioethicist who argues that the criminal law should be used ….
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2003.003921
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,946
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Bioethics and the Problem of Pluralism.Donald C. Ainslie - 2002 - Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):1-28.
Bioethics And The Problem Of Pluralism.Donald Ainslie - 2002 - Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):1-28.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Autonomy, the Good Life and Controversial Choices.Julian Savulescu - 2007 - In Rosamond Rhodes, Leslie Francis & Anita Silvers (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Blackwell. pp. 17--37.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
38 ( #273,222 of 2,427,251 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,061 of 2,427,251 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes