Issues in Law and Medicine 32 (2):143-171 (2017)

Authors
Mahesh Ananth
Indiana University South Bend
Abstract
Albert Jonsen and Stephen Toulmin have argued that the best way to resolve complex “moral” issues in clinical settings is to focus on the details of specific cases. This approach to medical decision-making, labeled ‘casuistry’, has met with much criticism in recent years. In response to this criticism, Carson Strong has attempted to salvage much of Jonsen’s and Toulmin’s version of casuistry. He concludes that much of their analysis, including Jonsen’s further elaboration about the casuistic methodology, is on the mark. In this essay, the details of Jonsen’s and Toulmin’s version of casuistry and the major criticisms against their approach to clinical decision-making are explicated. Furthermore, it is argued that Strong’s salvage efforts fail to deflect these criticisms. The upshot of this analysis, which includes a few additional criticisms, is that Jonsen’s and Toulmin’s version of casuistry is not an appropriate framework from which to resolve complex “moral” issues in clinical settings.
Keywords Medical Casuistry  Bioethics  case-based decision-making
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Respondeo: Method and Content in Casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):115-119.
Casuistry as Common Law Morality.Norbert Paulo - 2015 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (6):373-389.
Critiques of Casuistry and Why They Are Mistaken.Carson Strong - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (5):395-411.
The Priesthood of Bioethics and the Return of Casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):33-49.
How Jonsen Really Views Casuistry: A Note on the Abuse of Father Wildes.James M. Tallmon - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):103-113.
Advancing a Casuistic Model of Clinical Decision Making: A Response to Commentators.Mark R. Tonelli - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (4):504-507.
Can Phronesis Save the Life of Medical Ethics?Eric B. Beresford - 1996 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (3).
Casuistry and the Business Case Method.Martin Calkins - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2):237-259.
Character as a Safeguard for Journalists Using Case-Based Ethical Reasoning.Sandra L. Borden - 1999 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):93-104.
Casuistry, Virtue, and Business Ethics.Martin John Calkins - 1998 - Dissertation, University of Virginia

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-19

Total views
226 ( #45,206 of 2,455,389 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #23,632 of 2,455,389 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes