On Bourbaki’s axiomatic system for set theory

Synthese 191 (17):4069-4098 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we study the axiomatic system proposed by Bourbaki for the Theory of Sets in the Éléments de Mathématique. We begin by examining the role played by the sign \(\uptau \) in the framework of its formal logical theory and then we show that the system of axioms for set theory is equivalent to Zermelo–Fraenkel system with the axiom of choice but without the axiom of foundation. Moreover, we study Grothendieck’s proposal of adding to Bourbaki’s system the axiom of universes for the purpose of considering the theory of categories. In this regard, we make some historical and epistemological remarks that could explain the conservative attitude of the Group.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,203

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-26

Downloads
71 (#242,335)

6 months
11 (#499,984)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

What Bourbaki Has and Has Not Given Us.Enetz Ezenarro Arriola - 2017 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 32 (1).

Add more citations

References found in this work

General Theory of Natural Equivalences.Saunders MacLane & Samuel Eilenberg - 1945 - Transactions of the American Mathematical Society:231-294.
Non-Well-Founded Sets.Peter Aczel - 1988 - Palo Alto, CA, USA: Csli Lecture Notes.

View all 32 references / Add more references