Ape Autonomy? Social norms and moral agency in other species

In Klaus Petrus & Markus Wild (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Animals: Mind, Ethics, Morals. Transcript. pp. 173-196 (2013)
Abstract
Once upon a time, not too long ago, the question about apes and ethics had to do with moral standing—do apes have interests or rights that humans ought to respect? Given the fifty years of research on great ape cognition, life history, social organization, and behavior, the answer to that question seems obvious. Apes have emotions and projects, they can be harmed, and they have important social relationships
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Moral Machines.Jos de Mul - 2010 - Techne 14 (3):226-236.
A Cybernetic Theory of Morality and Moral Autonomy.Jean Chambers - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):177-192.
Intrinsic Value, Moral Standing, and Species.Rick O'Neil - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):45-52.
Added to PP index
2012-04-27

Total downloads
67 ( #89,916 of 2,235,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #67,633 of 2,235,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature