Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):534-547 (2002)
In our target article, we discussed the standards of evidence that could be used to identify adaptations, and argued that building an empirical case that certain features of a trait are best explained by exaptation, spandrel, or constraint requires the consideration, testing, and rejection of adaptationist hypotheses. We are grateful to the 31 commentators for their thoughtful insights. They raised important issues, including the meaning of “exaptation”; whether Gould and Lewontin's critique of adaptationism was primarily epistemological or ontological; the necessity, sufficiency, or utility of design evidence, phylogenetic analyses, homology, and molecular genetics in distinguishing exaptations from adaptations; whether adaptationists accept adaptationist hypotheses too quickly; and the real utility of adaptationism to human behavioral science. We organize our response along the major points of the target article, in some situations defending our original claims and in others modifying them. While debate on these issues will undoubtedly continue, we are cautiously optimistic that the main points of the target article (as modified by our response) will help move the debate in a positive direction.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly About Evolutionary Causes.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 2015 - Biological Theory 10 (4):DOI: 10.1007/s13752-015-0214-2.
Some Evolutionary Model or Other: Aspirations and Evidence in Evolutionary Psychology.Paul Sheldon Davies - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (1):83 – 97.
Similar books and articles
Adaptationism and Medicalization: The Scylla and Charybdis of Darwinian Psychiatry.Alfonso Troisi - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):422-423.
Towards an Evolutionary Pluralism? The Need to Establish Evidentiary Standards and Avoid Reification of Assumptions.Agustin Fuentes - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):518-519.
Adaptationism for Human Cognition: Strong, Spurious, or Weak?Scott Atran - 2004 - Mind and Language 20 (1):39-67.
Modest Adaptationism: Muddling Through Cognition and Language.Scott Atran - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):504-506.
Biological Levers and Extended Adaptationism.Gillian Barker - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (1):1-25.
Adaptationism – How to Carry Out an Exaptationist Program.Paul W. Andrews, Steven W. Gangestad & Dan Matthews - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):489-504.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #123,613 of 2,143,787 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #163,222 of 2,143,787 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.